Thank you.
One of the things that we're still faced with is the repercussions. If I receive an ad in the mail, I have to pay for the recycling of it through my municipality, and I have to pay with my time. If I receive an ad on TV, it doesn't infect my TV with a virus. It's my time and my space. I can change the channel. I can turn it off.
Suppose I receive a legitimate ad that I've agreed to from PlayStation, for example. The problem is when my privacy is breached later on, which it was.
What are the real repercussions then in terms of the engagement that we have in the protection of privacy and its use? There are two things. What do you think is fair for consumers to get out of this, especially in terms of unsolicited electronic messaging and the cost to them. What do you think is fair?
The inundation of advertising is not what the communication devices were really set up for. The way that they're used now is for emergencies and a whole series of other things, as well as the common stuff. For my phone to be tied up by a virus from an unsolicited email is not only an inconvenience; it can be quite a problem because it can't function in the meantime. What do you think is fair for consumers in this relationship? I would appreciate your input on that.