Thank you very much.
Thank you so much for coming back. As you said, the law has been in place for three years. I think what we heard from the testimony that came in is that people are giving us feedback about how they're working within it.
To the point my colleague made, I think we heard from businesses that they are trying to comply. I think that's certainly the intent, and they're looking to us to understand where there could be some improvements to help with compliance. For sure, applaud and know that the intent here is to try get at anti-spam and at the bad actors that can hurt overall confidence. The intent is to protect consumers. We heard, virtually overwhelmingly and unanimously, that there needs to be some clarification in some of the definitions. Maybe that's what I'll focus on, and you can talk about that.
For commercial electronic messages, we heard from many, almost everyone, asking for some clarity around that, because there's a lack of understanding around a CEM for business-to-business use. We heard examples of someone or an organization not being able to communicate to a customer to give them a notification.
Can you talk to us from your perspective? We heard the testimony. Is it worthwhile to do some further clarification on the definition of CEM to help with compliance?