I think there are a number of models the government has already used for applications for funding. They have frequently led to the same providers receiving the money. They've actually, I think, in some cases for the incumbents, learned to not invest until the government is willing to subsidize them.
When we're looking at these rural areas in particular, the number one thing the government should look at is who is already there. Who's already serving those communities? They're the ones who have invested in those areas and they are the ones who are going to be around long after the government funding is gone.