Yes. First of all, we have dozens, if not hundreds, of professors in partnerships, whose early ideas are scooped up in a partnership or a licence that never hits the Investment Canada Act.
On the Nortel thing, which I think is interesting and illustrative to this committee, I had many calls. We were part of the consortium that bought it, and our share of it was about $800 million U.S. I had many calls in the wee hours of the morning—two or three o'clock in the morning—in which the U.S. government, in the form of the Department of Commerce and Department of Justice, were making sure that the structure of the licences and the consortiums did not upset the competitive and fair balance of access to these 5G patents in the economy.
I could literally spend as much time as you want explaining how it's a very hands-on structure even in a single licence acquisition of foreign technology between two rival risk consortiums. It's a very deliberate and organized hands-on abstract construct, and that can apply to all aspects of what we do, whether it's buying a start-up or making more of an investment or a partnership in research and development.
You have to look at what the Austrians, the Germans, the French, the Brits, the Australians—