I agree with that, so let's imagine a world where we ramp up testing capacity to such a degree that there is a role for them to play. If there is a role for them to play, and adoption rates of 20% are, as we know, not going to be significantly effective and it's not even worth going down that road, let's double down on human resources. We should do that anyway, I agree, but if we can get to a 60% or 70% threshold by having an opt-out system that still preserves the choice of an individual who truly cares, wouldn't that make more sense, all else being true? I recognize that there are a lot of contingencies here about the data governance framework and the design of the tracing application, but if everything else preserves privacy in every way, is there any give on that particular issue?
On May 29th, 2020. See this statement in context.