Thank you very much for that question.
I'll go straight to the heart of what I was trying to say. I lost track of my text there for a minute.
As you know, any investment can be scrutinized for national security reasons. What I was saying is that in the current context, those reasons can be expanded. We have guidelines that the government publishes. Let's maybe publish expanded guidelines. This is what we—at least in the current context, but maybe going forward—consider to be national security: the food supply chain and the medical supply chain. Frankly, that's the deal with some of the concerns from SOEs as well. Are you threatening to steal Canadian technology, for example? These sorts of considerations we can deal with right now by expanding those guidelines. That's really what I was saying.
The best defence is to keep the Canadian economy strong and the valuation of Canadian firms fair. I think that some of the policies that we've seen in place and the support by the Bank of Canada and our banking system in general really help companies navigate without being undervalued unfairly.
The last point is that sometimes a Canadian company will need to find investors to stay afloat and keep jobs in Canada. We don't want to close the door to what would be a perfectly good foreign investment, if we can avoid that.
Those are my main points.