Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'm trying to take a different tack here. Rather than just looking at the issue of complete moratoriums or lowering the threshold in the ICA for a review, I want to zero in on the point you made, Mr. Burton, about how certain countries might employ different companies to take over certain parts of a business or an industry so that it doesn't trigger the review. Using that concept and marrying it with the concept of the visa framework review, could we look at a policy option that basically says if a country does x, y and z—let's say, takes Canadians hostage—then we would consider placing the country on a list where all investments or potential investments would trigger a net benefit review under the ICA? That would do two things. It would give Canada leverage in a situation, and it would arguably allow a discussion on whether or not that investment is in the best interests of Canadians to occur in a much clearer framework. Is that perhaps something that we could consider?