I'm not an expert who has studied the Rona acquisition. I was more making an issue about what is strategic and what is not.
I believe that you raised the issue of job creation and what happens after an investment. You mentioned a number of them that have ultimately been failures, whether it's the acquisition of Zellers by Target or the acquisition of Rona by Lowe's. The question I was raising is, are these strategic assets that need to be addressed in a separate way from other businesses?
The law as it is allows for.... When the government assesses net benefit, obviously one of the considerations is job creation or job maintenance. We can question if that was done in the right way at the time of those acquisitions. That's one question. There is also the issue of undertakings. We know that the law allows the government to impose undertakings. To some extent the Quebec government did that with the Rona acquisition.
Afterwards—