Thank you, Madam Chair. I'm very grateful for that.
Given that this is the last round of questioning, I think it will be devoted to mopping up and to clarifying anything I've had a hard time understanding.
One of the members of this committee was suggesting that, after reviewing the annual report, they could not determine which one of those acquisitions had an element of intellectual property that had been acquired as well.
Mr. Wakil, if I can go to you, I don't think it's the job of the annual report to clarify which acquisition involved IP and which one didn't. Am I correct in that assumption?