That's fair. I take that to mean that's not something we put on the table, but something we accepted because broadly or overall, the agreement is in our benefit. While this provision may not well be, it's still worth it.
I have a very specific question and it's just because a previous witness pointed this out. In BillC-4, to amend proposed subsection 6.2(2) of the Copyright Act, there's a reference to 50 years, which is inconsistent with the other dates that I see throughout C-4. I'm curious. Is that reference to 50 years supposed to be 70 years, or is it to be 50 years?