I'm sorry, but this is my time. I just want a straightforward answer on that. For some of my constituents—and I know with my service provider that I have to bundle that with something else that I don't want or not get it. That's an economic barrier for some Canadians. I think allowing for protection for some people who can afford it and not for others who can't is patently unfair. I'd ask you to revisit those policies, because even if they are offered for free, sometimes they're bundled with other things.
When it comes to the CRTC enforcement systems in place, Rogers—I'm calling you by your company's name; Sorry, Mr. Slawner—you mentioned, and I'm a big fan of this, too, that if you break the rules, you get punished for it. The CRTC has used AMPs in a way that I don't think is terribly effective at times and they can be a loss leader for some businesses. It's better to plead for forgiveness than to ask for permission. What more could they do that would actually get the bad actors out of the way?