Well, everyone takes advantage of it. I mean, it's a public-private partnership. Whether it's Rogers, Telus, Bell or any other thing, it's taking advantage of an opportunity.
My point here is that you're talking about a cut of a program from a CRTC decision, a regulatory body, that affected the lives of rural and remote Canadians. You're finally catching up on it, and then at the same time you're asking for more public resources and revenue and we have no guarantee that you won't have another public tantrum when it comes to the CRTC's decisions in the future.
What guarantees do we have that Bell will not do what it did back then? That actually delayed right now the connectivity of many Canadians. That's the reality. You took that decision right away, and you're making up for it now. What guarantee is there that we won't have a similar situation when the CRTC comes down with a decision and you cut back promised expansions?