I guess the immediate thought that comes to mind, without filtering myself, is that it's reprehensible. I know that the connecting families program was voluntary and that different telecoms across the country could choose whether or not to participate. If Bell is hiding behind subsidiaries so that people don't generally know that they're not including themselves in this program, that's not very [Technical difficulty—Editor], but of course, once again, just for a moment I'll say that I had trouble with the interpretation. I don't generally get online on a video conference, and I apologize for that.
We're talking about a level of service provision that would extend the connecting families program to all low-income people, and as for whether it's voluntary, that would be later, after the pandemic. For the short term, we're asking the government to provide a benefit of $50 a month to reduce Internet charges. If the $10-a-month Internet for the connecting families program were to be voluntary on behalf of telecoms, I'm not sure, but I think maybe the CRTC could rule that they must participate in such a thing, or possibly the government could provide subsidies for that.