I think the signal the government is sending is a very dangerous one, with potentially long-term consequences for Canada. As I said, the aerospace sector, especially on the commercial side, is a global industry, so when large orders come in, they trigger a global supply chain. Contract givers prefer to deal with places that support the aerospace sector and see its strategic importance. However, that isn't the message being sent to the aerospace sector today.
Canada is practically the only country in the world that could have a thriving aerospace industry but is choosing not to support it. Actions speak louder than words, and it's high time for action. The solutions exist. What should the government do? Provide immediate assistance to the most vulnerable members of the industry, because there are vulnerable members. The plans are out there; Ms. Benoît probably talked about that. We know what is needed: support for the airlines. We've said it before. We have to get them flying again, and the demand will follow. Investment in innovation is also needed. When I say innovation—to follow up on a question I was asked earlier—I am referring both to the very long term and to existing products. We can't focus solely on 2035 or 2050. To get there, we have to go through the 2020s. Action is needed on all of those fronts.