Thank you.
To MP Dreeshen's point, I think the affordability and accessibility study that we just completed covered a lot of the things that we'll probably hear again during the meetings we will schedule. I just think 10 hours at this point, considering that we've done an extensive study on affordability and accessibility already, is a little bit much.
I definitely agree that it's something to look at. I think it's important to take this into account and to get recommendations that are maybe specific to this deal. However, I don't see us needing more than two or three meetings to get really good recommendations on this and to get some testimony that will help back that up, which we can then add to the study on affordability and accessibility that has already been drafted and that we can actually get recommendations on very soon.
In the interest of time and in the interest of being efficient and effective, I feel that would be the best way forward. I don't see a need for five meetings or more. A couple of meetings to hear about this issue and to hear from a few experts on what difference this makes and how this can complement our study would be good, but not more than that, in my opinion.