The largest player in western Canada is Telus, and Bell is also in western Canada. In the case of Telus, they have both a residential business and a wireless business. Together, Rogers and Shaw would have strong capability in both residential and wireless businesses. We'd be far better matched to compete head-on with Telus in terms of the consumer market.
Rural Canadians, as you heard earlier, have either no Internet or very poor Internet, or only one provider. By the two of us coming together and the ability to put our balance sheets together and spend more capital, we can work hard to close that gap with the 600,000 rural Canadians who have inadequate or no Internet. In markets where they'll get Internet for the first time, and also in markets where they only have one provider, we will be that next provider from that perspective. That also includes rural small businesses.
With the business market as a whole, when you look at medium and large businesses and the largest governments in the country, you see that we really don't play in that market—neither does Shaw. That market pretty much belongs entirely to Bell Canada or to Telus. We've been out of that market because we don't have a national footprint. Any time we pitch up for the likes of the network for a major bank or for a major store, distribution chain, or for anyone who needs facilities across the country, we're at a competitive disadvantage because we don't have the network.
I can keep going, but the other thing—