Let's talk about return on value for consumers and for the Government of Canada, because it has been a long-standing policy, not only of Liberal governments but of Conservative governments, over the past decade to really encourage a fourth wireless carrier to ensure that we have competition and that prices are driven down.
There is a financial cost to the government in restricting the auction rules. I think you'd agree with that. The government lives with that cost in order to increase competition and benefit consumers. However, if the government subsidizes smaller regional players like Shaw at auction, only to see those same players subsequently acquired by one of the big three, isn't the government really subsidizing you, your shareholders and executives as you cash out?