On the mobile side, in a way, because of this strategy of encouraging a fourth player, we have this inefficient overbuilding that we don't have on the wireline side. With the wire line, to overbuild, you would need to have more wires coming into your home. Right now you have a phone company and a cable company. However, if Rogers just rolled out a network in Calgary and overbuilt, they would run new wires to people's homes in Calgary. That would clearly be inefficient.
In a way, what we've done on mobile is encourage this very inefficient fourth-player overbuilding model as though that is going to introduce enough competition. As Laura Tribe just said, it does lower prices in some markets where a fourth player becomes powerful enough to influence prices. However, clearly, because of the situation that we're looking at with Freedom right now, it doesn't create a long-lasting, robust model of competition that can survive a simple merger of two companies. We're always going to be one business deal away from the end of competition if that's our only strategy.