The fourth player is really the wrong strategy. As long as we have this strategy of nurturing a fourth player to introduce some degree of competition, we're really designing the system to fail. We're going to be one merger away from complete collapse of competition. A fourth player may be enough to influence prices to some degree, but it is not robust competition that can survive major deals like this one. This is clearly not going to be the only deal like this on the horizon.
What can the government do to encourage a fourth player? I think it's the wrong strategy. It's certainly not what I described as competition by design. I think, rather, what the government needs to do is to put its energy into encouraging other forms of competition for services so that this fourth player issue doesn't become.... It's not really the goal.