When you discuss the regional providers, including Shaw, they benefited from being able to acquire spectrum at lower costs throughout the set-asides. Unfortunately, these providers sometimes have a poor track record when it comes to investing and deploying that spectrum in rural communities. In fact, we understand that Shaw has, so far, deployed only about 8% of its holdings, despite acquiring more than $1.7 billion of heavily discounted spectrum on the assumption that it's going to be competing with the big three on price.
I'm curious what your position is. Does there need to be a “use it or lose it” deployment condition attached to the licence to ensure that providers who do buy spectrum are actually putting it to use for all Canadians, including those who live in rural areas? What do you see that “use it or lose it” concept actually being?