Thank you.
Given the fact that the efficiencies defence does still exist in the Competition Act, and given the fact that Rogers is saying that as a larger, better-capitalized company they will be able to invest in 5G, with all the commitments that they have made and that are on their website, etc., how...?
Is there any way the Competition Bureau, notwithstanding this efficiencies defence, could somehow make it a condition that Rogers in fact does deploy the 5G commitments they're making to remote communities and indigenous communities? Is that potentially a condition that could be put on an agreement to this acquisition?