Our position is that four isn't even enough in terms of the number of competitors out there to make sure that there are cheaper rates and more choice across the country. We forget that, in the focus on wireless in this arrangement, there is an impact on the cable side of the business, and the Internet side, with the growth that will occur for Rogers if it takes over Shaw.
That size, as I outlined in my opening remarks, has an impact on prices for cable television services. We need to have rules that confirm the CRTC's authority in the Broadcasting Act to protect consumers. Those same kinds of rules need to apply on the Internet side to protect consumers from the Internet operator using that size to reduce choice and access to Internet services, which is a real possibility.