Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'll continue my questions with Mr. Péladeau.
Rogers says it will invest more than $6 billion in western Canada to build out its 5G network, focusing obviously on all the benefits that will have for rural, remote and indigenous communities.
Living as I do in a remote region, I admit I'm not particularly eager to have 5G. We know it involves shorter-range waves. I think it's much less suited to large, thinly populated areas.
Is 5G really the panacea, as Rogers tried to have us believe last week? A number of incredible ads were broadcast about Bell's 5G during the hockey game I watched yesterday. Is 5G that important for the future?