The starting point is to recognize that the wireless assets have to go. One can understand why there may still be significant value for those two companies on the cable side. Of course, there's also the kind of competition that exists given that, as Dr. Winseck noted, a divided-up market dating back decades has fewer implications for the everyday consumer, although it may have some broader market impact.
On the wireless side, the impact is obvious, so full divestiture of the wireless assets to find some mechanism to maintain at least the prospect of a fourth national player has to be the starting point.