I think PMRA is a world-class institution. Besides Canada, the U.S. and Australia, there are very few pest management agencies that really uphold the high-level science, using risk as opposed to hazard.
The concern we have is that in the absence of data, as PMRA doesn't currently have a requirement under the Pest Control Products Act to actually do monitoring—water monitoring, for example, for us—they make very conservative assumptions that aren't based on real-world conditions. If that continues to happen, farmers don't have access to tools that actually.... They don't have to plough their land; they can allow cover crops and they can be more sustainable.
It also means that we will not get the next generation of chemistries registered in Canada, because we're taking away technologies, based on science that isn't complete. We need to make sure that PMRA has the data to do their work.