There was an article published in the Globe and Mail recently about the need to have more consistency in how businesses in general, whether they're small businesses or not, are defining what getting to net zero means. Right now there's not even consistency there in terms of how organizations are using offsets, for example, versus true reductions, and whether they're just focusing directly on their own operations or they're also targeting emissions from their value chain.
I think in general, as part of Canada's transition strategy to get to net zero, there does need to be more consistency and definition of what we mean by that. The pathways will look different for different industries. The pathways will also look different for different sizes of business. I think anything that on the whole would allow us to have a discussion where we're all talking about the same thing, and anything that provides more focus on the needs of small business, and especially what they need, which has been lacking, will be helpful as we think about this transition. Especially given that small and medium-sized businesses make up 99% of our economy, and we know that having a strong economy will be really important, we need to figure out how to transition the bulk of the economy together.