Thank you for your question, Mr. Amos.
Let me add to Mr. Samray's comments. If you compare $8 billion to the $30 billion that have been given to the fossil energy sector since the beginning of COVID-19, you realize that the priorities were perhaps poorly chosen in terms of a green recovery. Very concrete choices need to be made.
I would like to emphasize that we have to make the right decisions and avoid simply shifting the problems to other sectors. We must therefore base ourselves on lifecycle analysis criteria that consider the impacts, the problems and the solutions from the time the raw materials are extracted to the end of the production cycle and even to the post-consumer use stage. Sometimes solutions that are falsely good are suggested. At the moment, for example, nuclear power is being widely talked about as a solution. Nuclear power may produce few, if any, greenhouse gas emissions, but it generates other problems that will also fall onto the shoulders of our children.
So it is important to look closely at the science and to conduct lifecycle analyses. It's also helpful to look at the circular economy in general, starting with source reductions.