I actually feel the opposite.
First, we must not imagine that companies are giving workers a gift by telling them that they provide, for example, a defined benefit pension plan rather than a defined contribution plan. The issue of pension plans must be negotiated between the employer, meaning the company, and the union. Certainly, companies might prefer to provide one type of plan rather than another type. But given that it must be negotiated, I would say that it could be the opposite.
That was the first part of my answer. I would like to add a second point.
As Mr. Poilievre said earlier, it is in everyone's interest, the companies, the banks and the workers, for this to work. This is why a bill such as mine can be helpful. I am trying to put myself in a worker's shoes. A plan of that kind would be looked after and protected, and would become an additional guarantee. In my opinion, a pension plan of that kind would be an advantage. So I actually feel that it will not only protect the pension fund itself, but it will also protect this type of plan, the defined benefit plan.