I'll just speak to Sébastien's point.
It might make sense for there to be unanimous consent for us to move on from this conversation. You have a schedule, Chair. You've circulated it. I don't know the number of hours entirely, but I think the full three meetings would take us even beyond what you have scheduled, from my recollection, at least from hearing from witnesses. I know you're including clause-by-clause consideration in your schedule until the end of June.
It strikes me it would be much more efficient to stick to the current schedule that we have, and then to circle back at some point. If we deem that more witnesses are required, that we haven't heard from enough, we can have that conversation and cross that bridge when we come to it. Right now, we should proceed with your expedited schedule that you've already circulated. That would be the fastest for the Bloc, who are concerned about expediting, and obviously that includes hearing from witnesses.
I know we need unanimous consent, but I'm perfectly okay with forgetting we had this conversation for the last 20 minutes and moving on to ask questions of the sponsor.