The motion that was brought forward is admissible, as the legislative clerk stipulated.
With respect to the amendment proposed by MP Poilievre, it is admissible. He's amending the motion so that instead of going strictly to clause-by-clause study, we would actually go back to, I want to say, the original plan of seeing witnesses for this study.
As I explained, my hope was that we would be able to get everything done as soon as possible if we were to be tight on time.
I'm going to check with the clerk.
Mike, is there any deviation to the plan?