We're investing more in foreign oil, as you're doing, and profiting from the biggest-emitting country in the world, in China. Thank you for your lecture on all of that, but it's been pretty clear through your testimony today, if I may say so, that whether it's in your refusal to commit to turning down these massive and unjustifiable subsidies in Ontario that have driven people into poverty and people to the food bank; whether it's in your refusal to recognize the genocide in China against the Uighurs for fear that you would lose out on business in that country; whether it's in your false statement that your company is net zero when it's not net zero; or whether it is in your decision to continue profiting from foreign petroleum investments in the Middle East and Latin America while opposing our energy workers here at home, your talk is really more hypocritical window-dressing than it is actually environmental, social, and governance-based.
When we see people who come here with their big salaries and lecture working class people about why they should pay more for energy and have fewer jobs in the resource sector, while you are protected and your company makes a fortune from it, can you understand why people are just a little bit suspicious of the motives?