Yes, Mr. Poilievre. I think it's critical to put this in some context.
The key, in terms of our argument, is that the promise that employers made to workers on deferred wages and benefits is supposed to be accounted for, obviously, in their books. Of course, what we see time and time again is that employers have not made the contribution or have allowed their pension fund to not meet the obligation.
When they get into bankruptcy, we're told the secure creditors—the banks and others—have to get ahead of workers. We think that's fundamentally wrong. In regard to the situation you're describing about local contractors, they will be in the line; the question is what priority they might be. Of course, they might be in back of workers.
Our argument is that workers should be the first in line, and then we'll work our way through who else should be there once workers' pension and benefits are taken care of—