I'm not certain. I don't believe so. There were really only the super creditors and the rest in this case. The employees were part of the super creditors and the banks. I don't believe it would have made any meaningful difference to Sears pensioners.
I don't agree with that process. Pensioners need to be treated at least equally to other debtors with regard to the debt that is owed them. It's easy to say that all creditors are debtors, but you have a different type of debt with a pension plan. It's a long-term outstanding debt. Pensioners have to be treated as super creditors to make it meaningful, and it would have been meaningful for Sears pensioners.