That's a complicated question, Mr. Duvall. The situation that Sears found itself in is not unique but it is substantially different from other examples, like that of Nortel. The Sears situation involved a specific business practice the hedge fund used against the company. There are no laws in Canada that interfere in that process. Should there be? Well, that's a wholly different question for another day. Maybe they should be addressed as well. However, in this case they did what was legal, and I'm not here to dispute that.
The CCAA has now morphed from a restructuring law to what appears to be an orderly bankruptcy law. There's no doubt in my mind that Sears knew they were going to close that business out when they sought court protection, but they used the CCAA laws to be able to get DIP money and to organize it, maybe to the benefit of the company and maybe not.