Let me ask about the balance between protecting those who deserve to be protected, the pensioners who have worked their entire lives—the Supreme Court has acknowledged that these pensions are deferred wages, and that much is clear—against the certainty in the restructuring process for lenders. Can we look to international examples that identify superpriority in full? I've had examples put to me that show that, as I think we heard from the Canadian Federation of Pensioners in previous testimony, other jurisdictions have a cap, a superpriority of up to, say, $50,000.
I wonder what you think about establishing a cap in this legislation that would then strike the balance between both protecting pensioners and establishing certainty.