Thank you, Madam Chair, and thanks to our guests for being back today.
I'm going to follow up on something and correct it as well. I was using a term last time, “overturn”, which was incorrect. I stand corrected, and I appreciate it. What I was really looking at was the meddling—which is the word I should have used—with regard to the CRTC's decision.
It also resolves a statement from the Governor in Council that said:
Whereas, in considering the petitions and all of the information and advice received in respect to them, the Governor in Council considers that the final rates set by the decision do not, in all instances, appropriately balance the objectives of the wholesale services framework recognized in Order in Council P.C. 2016-332 of May 10, 2016 and that they will, in some instances, undermine investment in high-quality networks
My question from that is, what is the department's response to this having taken place? We've seen some market changes related to it.