I have a couple of quick points.
I support the wording as it is, because we don't have time to have another meeting to try to force things to happen. I know it's a bit more direct, with the path, but that's because of the time that we have in those three meetings. We don't need to have another meeting to try to get the things going again.
I do support returning and finishing the rural broadband study later on. I'll just remind everyone that this committee—and I think there were a couple of members who were here—passed a rural broadband study unanimously just a few years ago and most of those recommendations were never followed through on. A lot of work has been done on that and there are some things that could happen. I do support finishing up that work, and then moving on. Mr. Lemire is making a good point because we have invested in it, but with the timing of the stuff, I support it as it stands.
Lastly, there's no way we can meet in person.