To the point about where we go forward, “the evolution of Canada's domestic vaccine manufacturing capacity” is good, in that it takes us to where we are and why we are here today.
My interest would be would to look at the steps that Canada can and should take to restore its domestic vaccine manufacturing capacity. Would that be encapsulated by it, or would it make sense to say, “the evolution of Canada's domestic vaccine manufacturing capacity, including the steps Canada can and should take to restore it”? I don't know if that would be a friendly amendment, but I think we should drive a forward-looking question as much as anything.
How do we restore this capacity, so that we don't again find ourselves in the position we're in today?