Sherry, why not do it in the same way that the Speaker asks for nays in the House? If it's not unanimous, why doesn't somebody chip in with a nay? Then we don't have to have a recorded vote. A recorded vote is fine, but in the interests of time, it might make sense if somebody doesn't agree with the subamendment to say nay, and we can then do a recorded division. We could whip through it a bit faster that way.
On December 1st, 2020. See this statement in context.