What this bill outlines—which was a bolt-on to a previously failed privacy bill—is driven by trying to imitate what's going on in Europe, but it basically says that we're going to legislate harms, the highest level of harms in AI. It has already failed to define it well, because the minister has already had to revise the definition.
Are the highest risks or harms the only harms that are potential out there, and what are all the levels? There are various levels of AI that can impact people, besides the highest level that they're legislating.