Thank you for that.
As members of Parliament, we're often in reactive mode to what our constituents bring to us, and I think your department is now generally in reactive mode to these allegations coming forward.
The review by RCGT identified a number of instances where SDTC was not in compliance with its contribution agreement with ISED.
I guess what I want to know is, in trying to learn a lesson from this and find ways of being proactive, have you identified other situations in other contribution agreements where this potential may exist? What lessons are you taking from this?
I understand that you're waiting for a full review, but surely you must be taking this and saying that there could potentially be other troubles out there. What are you proactively doing to make sure that other contribution agreements are in compliance?