Certainly, a core goal I have as a public servant serving the government is to try to faithfully execute the requests of the minister. Those are to get to the facts, to get to the bottom of things, as he has said; to support the government as we may be called upon to follow up on the results of the review of McCarthy Tétrault and then faithfully execute any changes to the contribution agreement and the management response and action plan; and to support any response that is needed from ISED to the Auditor General's findings when they come out, presumably later in the year.
Those will be the first things: to make sure we're supporting the government in its effort to get to the bottom of things and to take the measures necessary to restore public confidence.
I would just say, more generally, as a senior public servant, that SDTC is supported by ISED through this contribution agreement. This is an area where some weaknesses have been shown. Where it's obviously a file of some public profile, it would be seen to be exercising diligence in restoring public confidence in the use of public money. As well, to the extent that there are weaknesses found, they would be corrected swiftly. I would say it's no more complicated than that.