I understand the context of the period of time when the entire world was being impacted by COVID. Supply chains were being impacted. Businesses were being impacted. We all know that. We all know as MPs, all 338 of us, that that's what was happening in our ridings.
Fast-forward to today. We're in the position of, to my understanding, the fund's being frozen, and there are investigations under way that are looking at this. My perspective is that all the governance in place of any entity—especially and particularly entities where funds are provided to invest in companies, in this case by a government, so they are taxpayer funds—is followed, whether the context is COVID or not COVID. I think that, in my mind, is what I'm looking at.
Would you still stand behind your decisions in terms of being there when there's a potential conflict, or an appearance of a potential conflict, in your decision-making or any of the board's decision-making? Should that have happened?