I'm happy to and happy to hand it to Jonathan.
Not to get too legal, but under the current framework a policing operation is going to take place under international human rights law and domestic human rights law. That's where Canada has taken its international obligations and has brought them into how we legislate.
When you're looking at the legal regime on the use of force under international and domestic human rights laws, it provides that instruction to police. That's why we have it referenced in our recommendations about compliance. It's not just with international humanitarian law, which, as Jonathan mentioned, applies during times of armed conflict, but it's realizing that we have that interplay between human rights law and humanitarian law and the domestic context of that applying in Canada as well as for Canadian operations overseas in partnered military operations.
That's why we absolutely referenced those two legal regimes and the fact that AI and those capabilities all have to be used in compliance with that pre-existing body of law. Again, we see it as a missed opportunity to make that explicit, and that's how it could be included in definitions, etc.
I'll pass the floor to Jonathan for anything additional.