Absolutely.
Thank you for the question. I think it's a great question.
We all struggle with understanding what AI is, partly because we are prone to thinking that it's one thing, and it's not.
With respect to what is in part 3, or AIDA, right now, I think you have two pieces. There's the high-impact AI portion that we've talked about, and then there's also the general-purpose technology. Both are mirroring what's in the EU, but in terms of defining what the high-impact areas are, I think we will not be able to capture everything that AI is going to become, so we need to start somewhere. I think this is a good start. I think some wordsmithing needs to be done because the definitions are a little bit broad.
When you move over to the general-purpose technology, this is also causing issues now. President Macron in France has said this general-purpose technology regulation is a little bit misguided, and we need to rethink that.
In terms of the high-impact piece, I think that makes sense and I think the approach we're taking is good.
Do I think it's perfect? No, but it's something we can work on.