Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'd like to thank the witnesses for being here.
Professor Papernot, you talked about the fact that nothing in the bill currently guarantees that anonymity will be preserved. You also talked about de‑identification or anonymization of data, for example. It seems to me that these methods existed before the advent of artificial intelligence, and that economists and statisticians have used them. You put noise in the data, you obtain a regression, and it produces the same result.
As you said, the algorithms are now able to handle the data in such a way that anonymity is no longer guaranteed. However, Part 1 of the bill is very specific about what we consider to be methods that guarantee anonymity. It seems to me that technology is changing very rapidly. Shouldn't there be broader regulations in order to move the framework of what we consider to be technologies that guarantee anonymity at a faster pace than the legislative pace?