You're referring to sensitive uses. I think there are ways to think about disinformation risk that would certainly fit into the categories that I described regarding potential psychological harm or impact to human rights.
I think what's really important is that the approach to defining what's high risk is clear and can evolve for changing challenges like misinformation and disinformation. That's the opportunity in the AIDA: to define clearly what's high risk and a process for evolving it over time.