No problem.
To your question about whether there should be a threshold or some sort of test for harm, I think we would agree that there should be. This is maybe just an issue of clarification, because elsewhere in the bill there are references to significant or material harm. Maybe what we really need to do is have some consistency in the language.
The final thing I'll say here is that I think these recommendations all speak to the ability to make some adjustments in this bill and land it in a really workable place. If you have use cases that are about the material harms you're concerned about, whether they're health impacts or economic outcomes, insert some factors for what a high-impact system is to give clarity there, establish a test for harm or a threshold for harm and then enable and empower sectoral regulators to do what they do best. They can draw upon their extensive expertise to apply that approach for their areas of regulation. I think that can provide a path to having the type of flexible policy framework you're looking to build.