I think I would echo a lot of the comments from my counterparts and point in particular to the definition of “harm”, because I think that could solve a lot of issues here. If you have a test of material harm, that can resolve exactly what the threshold is for both the identification and mitigation of risks associated with specific use cases for AI systems.
Right now, the definition simply says harm includes psychological harm or economic harm, but there's no calibration for what harm is really defined as, nor a test for that.