I think there's still some work to do here. Just to finish my comment from earlier, I think it has been echoed that at the intersection of the two is that copyright is a framework for ensuring compensation and ensuring the application of moral rights and so on. In the context of AI and the uses of copyrighted material, we can create a framework for when that happens and how it happens.
For example, one of our priorities is ensuring that the input that forms the basis of material that the AI systems draw from.... Let's be clear, they are existing works that were authored by DGC directors and other creators in our ecosystem, as the case may be, depending on the medium. It's important to effectively apply the requirements of copyright to ensure consent, compensation and credit and to relate those to AI.
Therefore, we need to strengthen the AI side of the equation to ensure more transparency in the data that's used and more proactive “opting in”, where there's consent for that, to ensure there are opportunities for organizations like ours or for the individual artist to pursue the compensation they are entitled to.